How To Protect The Ocean

Categories

science
citizen science
general
climate change
social enterprise
Tourism
Marine Science
ocean conservation
Sharks
Ocean
nemo
ecotourism
Marine Conservation
finding dori
harambe
Marine Protected Areas
shark attack
Oceans Day
finding dory
Shark Week
algae
SCUBA Diving
Arbonne
Arctic Ocean
drones
blackfish
marine conservation conferences
sea turtle
IMCC
Orca
Jairo Mora
Plastic Pollution
women in science
Surfing
ocean news
funding
marine education
Marine Conservation Career
Asha DeVos
Ocean Talk Friday
Fishing
Leadership
Conferences
seagrass
science debate
antarctica
marine science management
Conservation
marine biology jobs
politics
red sea
diving
Oil Spill
great barrirer reef
Ocean Optimisim
Nakawe
Ocean Optimism
Ross Sea MPA
Stakeholders
grassroots
grassroots conservation
teaching
film
poaching
ocean planning
biodiversity
Polar Bear
marine biology
Interviews
2017
Tilikum
Sustainable Fisheries
Beach
Fake News
Science Communication
Lobbying
Snorkeling
aquarium
stranding
wildlife documentaries
Advocacy
Fisheries
social science
journalism
ocean use
climate science
earth hour
Manatee
Dolphins
Social Change
Women 4 Science
Whales
Sci Comm
Cape Cod Seal
Taiwanese White Dolphin
Dolphin Rescued
Grand Cayman
Paris Climate Change Agreement
Celebrities
Shark Conservation
Sea Wolves
Cod
Climate Change Reduction
Ocean Plastic Pollution
Salt Marsh
Shark Dragged
Water Quality
brexit
Lost Sharks
River Sharks
Marine Conservation Careers
Sea Otters
Oceanswell
Fish Farm
Hurricane Harvey
Whale Sharks
Social Marketing
Invertebrates
Tales From The Sea
Graduate Student
Entrepreneur
Octo
Remote Sensing
Salmon
Open Access
Marine Mammals
Vaquita
Sperm Whale
Seabirds
Coastal Land Loss
SciComm
Coastal Habitat
Local Politics
Passion
Fisheries Science
Educator
Indiginous
IAMJAIRO
Carbon Tax
Jellyfish
Plogging
Fukushima
Recycle
Ocean Wise
Plastic Straws
Underwater Performer
recycling
Tuna
Coral Reef
Tailless Whales
Immigration
Kilauea Volcano
Shark Fishing
Marine Mammal
Marine Litter
Jairo Mora Sandoval Bravery Award
UK Marine Conservation Zones
Cephalopods
Squid Cephalopods
Conference
Marine Conservation Conference
Hack-a-thon
Art of Storytelling for Science
COMPASS
Plastic Pollution in the Ocean
Lionfish
IMCC5
Right Whales
Scott Pruitt
Southern Resident Orca
Nurse Sharks
Decolonizing Conservation
Crabs
Hermaphrodite Sharks
Land-Based Shark Fishing
Sea Turtles
Great White Sharks
Greenhouse Gases
Nassau Grouper
Boyan Slant
dolphin
Seaworld
King Penguins
Marine Philanthropy
Ocean Acidification
Red Tide
Stingrays
Marine Debris
Shark
High Seas
Ocean Clean Project
Impact Investing
Coelacanth
Sea Stars
Marineland
Eco-Friendly Products
Humpback Whales
Sea Level Rise
Deep Sea Coral Reef
Kelp forest
Pipeline
Sustainable
Seals
Shark Cage Diving
Sharkwater Extinction
Seafood
California
Coral Reef Algae
Oceanpreneur
Hurricane Florence
Tiger Shark
Overfishing
Southern Resident Orcas
Science Journal
PETA
Ocean Dead Zones
Dolphinarium
Shark Culling
Whaling
Coral
Ocean Clean Up Project
Orcas
Tsunami
Sei Whale
Community Conservation
OCEANARCH
Open Access Journals
Barndoor Skate
My Green Butler
Lonely Whale
Beaked Whales
Northern Right Whale Festival
Marine Mammal Captivity
Podcasting For The Environment
Salish Sea
Living Species Report
Conservation Marketing
Marine Biology Colleges
US Midterm Elections 2018
Marine Policies
Academic Science Journals
Shark Management
Conch Shells
Carbon Footprint
Love the Ocean
Consumer Trends
Science Journals
Marine Conservation Art
Climate Report
Marine Science and Conservation
Marine Social Science
Marine Sewage
Diversity In Careers
Mobile Conservation
WWF Canada
MarXiv
Indigenous
Manta Ray
Monk Seal
Seaweed
Blue Mind
Holiday Plastics
Patreon
Zinke
Whale Entanglement
Ocean Stories
Japan Whaling
Decompression Sickness
Status Quo Bias
Government Shutdown
New Year's Resolutions
Northern Right Whale Calf
Northwest Passage
Aquaman
Southern Resident Orca Population
Plastic Pollution Reduction
Bluebottle Jellyfish
IUU Fishing
Fatberg
Aquaculture
Ocean Cleanup Project
Ocean Ramsay
Governor Ron Desantis
Marine Careers
Zero Waste
Fish Markets
Plastic Packaging Free
Elephant Seal
Whale Seaside Sanctuaries
Reef Safe Sunscreen
Danni Washington
Lobster
Second Hand Clothing
Ocean Art
Participatory Science
Andrey Dolgov
Capelin
Chowder
Sea Urchins
Wildlife
WasteShark
Thrift Stores
Sea Lions
Plastic Pollution Climate Change
Deepwater Horizon
Telemetry Tags
Ethiopian Plane Crash
Greta Thunberg
Mako Shark
Plastic Straw Ban
Scientific Journals
Marine Protected Areas Climate Change
Marine Conservation Organizations
Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez
Renewable Energy
Sea Lions Herring
Conservation Statistics
Shark Protection
Walruses
Microfibres
Floodplains
Leatherback Sea Turtles
PEW
Cuttlefish
Horseshoe Crabs
Notre Dame Cathedral
Earth Day
Seal Rescue
Ocean Conservancy Trash Free Seas
Sustainable Asia
Marine Mammal Stranding
Grey Whale
Basking Sharks
NOAA
Marine Mammals In Military
Radio
Ocean Lifestyle
Tornado
Planet Tech
Collision Conference
Fast Fashion
Puffins
Nature Documentaries
Protected Species
CITES
Animal Welfare
LGBTQ
World Ocean's Day
Pride Month
Marine Debris Clean Up
Ghost Nets
Pacific Whale Foundation
Narluga
Whale Sanctuaries
Regenerative Agriculture
Loggerhead Sea Turtles
Octopus
Sargassum Belt
Fish
Orca Eating Great White Sharks
Northern Right Whale
Harmful Algal Blooms
Living Shorelines
Dr. Edie Widder
Single-Use Plastics
Sea Ice
Neil Degrasse Tyson
Fionn Ferreira
Freshwater Species
Florida
Endangered Species
Guitarfish
Wedgefish
Marine Mammal Science
Environmental Studies And Sciences
Climate Change Is Real
Donating
Loop
Codfather
Florida Keys
Cuba
Hurricane Dorian
Speak Up For Blue
TikTok
Illegal Fishing
Blob
Trump
United Nations
Nuclear Waste
Climate Strike
Environmental Lawyers
So You Want To Be A Marine Biologist
Deep Sea Mining
Great Barrier Reef
Virtual Reality
Mote Marine Laboratory
NAUI
Sawfish
Microplastics
Duke University
Spiny Lobster
Invasive Species
podcast
Fish Quotas
NFL
Fisheries And Oceans
Australia Heat
Climate Action
Top Episodes in 2019
Happy New Year
Australian WildFires
Marine Pollution
Food
Fukushima Radiation
Acoustic Noise On Coral Reefs
Secchi Disk
Government
Talking Oceans
Conch
Sea Grant
Sexual Assault
Coronavirus
Tiger King
Gulf Of Mexico
Fish To Door
Narwhal
Planet Of The Humans
Wildlife Photography
Deep-Sea Squid
Black Lives Matter
EarthX
Deep Sea
Behaviour Change
Mangrove
Illegal Trade
Colonialism
Mangoves
Shark Week 2020
Shark Science
Racism
Deep-Sea
Anthropause
Tagging
Sea Change Health
Marine Planning
Pinnipeds
Antarctic
Policy
change
Ecology
Diversity
Black In Marine Science
Sustainable Lifestyle
Top Episodes in 2020
Decade Of The Ocean
Sustainability
Blue Whales
Whale
Migration
Documentaries
Nutrients
fundraising
Blue Carbon
Sea Lion
Ocean Sounds
Water Pollution
Fisheries Policy
Shipping
Navy
Surfrider
Electric Vehicle
Climate Justice
Collaboration
non-profits
Blue Nature Alliance
Penguin
science communicator
Movies
Fisheris
Activism
EV
Coral Reefs
Entrepreneurship
Socia Enterprise
Ocean Action
Live For A Better Ocean
Blue Foods
Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion
Oceans Week
fishers
Speak Up
Restoration
Mining
Mississippi
Deep-Sea Mining
Cetaceans
Action
Innovation
Sewage Treatment
Mangroves
Paul Watson
For-Purpose Business
Greenwashing
Climate Crisis
Corals
Act for the blue
Business for the environment
Ocean Justice and Equity
Small Islands
Beaches
Sustainable Business
Local
Kelp Forests
Diversity And Inclusion
willow project
Sargassum
Marine Conservation Jobs
Orca Capitivity
Community
Human Behavior
Sand Dunes
Conservation Story
Stingray
Ocean Justice
EcoBusiness
Sea Otter
Sustainable Companies
Inclusion, Equality
Photography
Eutrophication
Ocean Conservation Commitments
Inspiration
B Corp
Marine Protected Area
The Faroe Islands
Electric Boats
Ocean Sole
Coastal Resilient
Seal
Students
Careers
Behavior Change
Water
Women in Marine Science
ocean education
Ocean Leaders
Climate Change Resiliency

Archives

2024
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2023
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2022
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2021
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2020
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2019
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2018
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2017
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2016
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2015
December
November
October
September
August
July
June

February 2024
S M T W T F S
     
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29

Syndication

Andrew Lewin discusses a lawsuit involving Dr. Michael Mann, a prominent climate scientist. Dr. Mann sued Rand Simberg and Mark Stein for defamatory online posts made over a decade ago by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review. Lewin also explores the history of attacks on climate scientists by right-wing climate deniers and the misleading tactics used by oil companies to downplay environmental concerns.

Tune in to learn more about the case and the importance of speaking up for the ocean.

Link to article: https://www.npr.org/2024/02/08/1230236546/famous-climate-scientist-michael-mann-wins-his-defamation-case

Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.
 
Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI

Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc 

 

Dr. Michael Mann, a prominent climate scientist, filed a lawsuit against individuals who defamed him online by comparing him to a child molester and calling his work fraudulent. The defendants in the case were Rand Simberg, a policy analyst, and Mark Stein, a right-wing author. The defamatory statements were made in online posts published over a decade ago by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review, respectively.

The lawsuit brought attention to the issue of attacks on climate scientists, particularly those who advocate for action on climate change. Dr. Mann is well-known for creating the famous "hockey stick" graph, which visually represents the increase in global temperatures since the Industrial Revolution. The graph gained widespread recognition after being featured in former Vice President Al Gore's documentary on climate change.

The defamatory comments made by Simberg and Stein were not only false but also highly offensive. Simberg compared Dr. Mann to Jerry Sandusky, a former football coach at Penn State University who was convicted of child sexual abuse. Simberg accused Dr. Mann of "molesting and torturing the data," equating his scientific work with the heinous actions of a child abuser.

The lawsuit resulted in a mixed verdict. While Dr. Mann was awarded compensatory damages of only $1 from each defendant, the jury ordered Simberg to pay $1,000 in punitive damages and Stein to pay $1,000,000 in punitive damages. The relatively low compensatory damages raised some controversy, but the verdict still sent a message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech.

The case highlighted the increasing attacks on climate scientists and the need to protect their credibility and careers. Organizations like the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund have been working to support scientists who face harassment and defamation for their work on climate change. The verdict in Dr. Mann's case may serve as a deterrent for public figures, including politicians and CEOs, who engage in attacks on climate scientists.

However, it is important to note that the ruling may not have a significant impact on anonymous online attackers. The liability verdict and the relatively low damages may not deter individuals who hide behind anonymity to spread false information and defame scientists. Nonetheless, the case sets a precedent and emphasizes the importance of evidence-based discourse when discussing climate change.

Overall, Dr. Mann's lawsuit against those who defamed him online sheds light on the challenges faced by climate scientists and the need to protect their integrity and reputation. It serves as a reminder that freedom of speech does not give individuals the right to spread false information or engage in personal attacks. By standing up for himself and other scientists, Dr. Mann has taken a step towards ensuring that climate scientists can continue their important work without fear of harassment or defamation.

The verdict in the case of Dr. Michael Mann suing Rand Simberg and Mark Stein sends a clear message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech. While the damages awarded may not have been substantial, the ruling has the potential to deter public figures and others from launching similar attacks on climate scientists.

The case highlights the increasing attacks on climate scientists and the need to protect their credibility and careers. Climate scientists, like Dr. Mann, face pressure and harassment from various sources, including politicians, higher-ups, and even common individuals on social media platforms. These attacks aim to undermine their work and discredit the scientific consensus on climate change.

The verdict in this case serves as a warning that there are consequences for defaming and falsely attacking climate scientists. While the compensatory damages awarded were minimal, the punitive damages send a stronger message. Rand Simberg was ordered to pay $1,000 in punitive damages, while Mark Stein was ordered to pay $1,000,000. Although the focus has been on the low compensatory damages, the significant punitive damages highlight the severity of the false accusations made against Dr. Mann.

The ruling may not directly impact anonymous online attackers, but it can deter public figures and those with influence from launching similar attacks. The liability verdict and the dollar figures associated with the judgment serve as a reminder that there are legal consequences for spreading false information and defaming scientists.

The case of Dr. Mann v. Simberg and Stein is significant because it represents one of the first instances where climate deniers have been taken to court for their attacks on climate scientists. The verdict sets a precedent and may encourage other scientists to stand up against false accusations and harassment.

Protecting climate scientists is crucial for the advancement of climate change research and action. Scientists who speak out about climate change and its impacts should not face harassment or defamation for doing their job. The verdict in this case is a step towards ensuring that scientists can continue their work without fear of retribution.

Overall, while the damages awarded may not have been substantial, the verdict in the case sends a strong message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech. It serves as a deterrent for public figures and others who may consider launching similar attacks. By protecting climate scientists, we can foster an environment where scientific research and evidence-based discussions on climate change can thrive.

The ruling in the case of Dr. Michael Mann against Rand Simberg and Mark Stein highlights the need to protect scientists who speak out about climate change and reduce the harassment they face online. Dr. Mann, a prominent climate scientist known for his famous hockey stick graph, sued Simberg and Stein for defamatory online posts comparing him to a child molester and calling his work fraudulent.

The verdict, although controversial due to the relatively low damages awarded, sends a message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech. This is significant because climate scientists often face attacks on their credibility and careers when they speak out about climate change. The ruling may deter public figures, including politicians and CEOs, from launching attacks on climate scientists.

The harassment faced by climate scientists is a growing concern, as evidenced by the increasing number of cases handled by organizations like the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund. Scientists who speak out about climate change are often targeted by online attackers who spread misinformation and attempt to discredit their work. This not only undermines the credibility of scientists but also hinders efforts to address climate change and protect the environment.

The ruling in Dr. Mann's case serves as a reminder that there are consequences for defaming scientists and spreading false information. It emphasizes the importance of protecting scientists who are working to raise awareness about climate change and its impacts. By holding individuals accountable for their defamatory statements, the ruling helps create a safer environment for scientists to speak out without fear of harassment or career repercussions.

However, it is important to note that the ruling may not have a significant impact on anonymous online attackers. The liability verdict and relatively low damages may not deter all individuals from launching attacks on climate scientists. Nonetheless, the ruling sets a precedent and sends a message that there are limits to what can be said without evidence or justification.

In conclusion, the ruling in Dr. Michael Mann's case highlights the need to protect scientists who speak out about climate change and reduce the harassment they face online. It serves as a reminder that defamatory statements and false attacks on scientists have consequences. By creating a safer environment for scientists to share their research and findings, we can foster a more informed and productive dialogue about climate change and work towards effective solutions.

Direct download: HTPTO_E1568_ClimateScientistMakesAStatement.mp3
Category:climate science -- posted at: 12:00am EDT

1