Abandoned fish farms in Greece are plaguing the coastline with marine debris; however, Healthy Seas is working to clean up some of the sites and raise awareness for support to tell the Greek government that fish farm owners should be responsible for cleaning up their sites once the business is done operating. 

In this episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, host Andrew Lewin discusses the pressing issue of ghost farms—abandoned fish farms that are polluting oceans, particularly in Greece. The episode highlights the work of the organization Healthy Seas, which is actively involved in cleaning up these ghost farms.

Key Points:

• Definition of Ghost Farms: Ghost farms are abandoned fish farms that were once operational but have been left to deteriorate, leading to significant environmental pollution. Unlike ghost nets, which can be found randomly in the ocean, ghost farms are known sites with identifiable owners.

• Extent of the Problem: There are over 150 ghost farm sites identified in Greece, with one cleanup in 2024 removing over 40 tons of marine debris, including plastics and fishing nets. The cleanup costs range from 100,000 to 200,000 euros, depending on the site's location and accessibility.

• Healthy Seas' Approach: Healthy Seas, led by Veronica Mikos, began addressing this issue after encountering a local environmentalist while on a project in Greece. They have since cleaned up two ghost farms and are advocating for better policies and enforcement to prevent future abandonment.

• Challenges in Cleanup: The cleanups are labor-intensive and require specialized equipment. Many of the materials, such as polystyrene, degrade and pose risks to marine life, as fish may mistake them for food.

• Policy and Enforcement Issues: Although laws exist regarding environmental protection and aquaculture, enforcement is lacking. Veronica suggests that fish farming companies should be required to deposit funds to cover cleanup costs, ensuring accountability.

• Community Involvement and Awareness: Healthy Seas emphasizes the importance of raising awareness about ghost farms and involving local communities in discussions about aquaculture practices. They aim to educate future aquaculture professionals about the environmental responsibilities associated with fish farming.

The episode concludes with a call to action for better policies and community engagement to ensure that abandoned fish farms are cleaned up and that the aquaculture industry operates sustainably.

Healthy Seas Podcast: https://www.speakupforblue.com/show/speak-up-for-the-ocean-blue/show-199/

YouTube Video from Healthy Seas: https://youtu.be/yu56xH8MQxg?si=--VsZQIK7fk3yhlO

Rebuilding fisheries requires information on fisheries stock assessments for each species. Collecting that data is not easy; it takes time and money to do. The Canadian Government is mandated to gather information on the 200 commercially fished species, but it's lacking. Not to worry. Ocean Canada has taken on the burden to collect and presenting the fisheries information in their Annual Fisheries Audit. 

In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lewin interviews Rebecca Schijns, a fisheries scientist with Oceana Canada, to discuss the findings of the 8th Annual Fisheries Audit. The audit aims to assess the health of Canadian fish populations and the effectiveness of fisheries management.

Key Highlights from the Audit:

Current Status of Fish Populations:

Just over one-third (35%) of Canadian fish populations are assessed as healthy, an improvement from less than a third in the previous year.

Approximately 34.5% of fish stocks are in an uncertain status, lacking defined benchmarks for sustainable fishing.

The remaining stocks are categorized as follows:

1. 13% in the cautious zone

2. 17% in the critically depleted zone

Importance of Audits:

Oceana Canada began conducting these audits in 2017 due to a lack of clear data on fishery health.

The audits compile publicly available government documents, stock assessments, and management plans to create a comprehensive overview of fishery status.

Positive Developments:

High-quality rebuilding plans have been developed for several critically depleted stocks, including mackerel and cod, with timelines for recovery.

Increased consideration of climate change impacts in scientific advice and management decisions.

A slight decrease in the number of stocks in the critical zone, indicating progress in stock assessments.

Concerns and Challenges:

Despite the positive developments, there is a slow rollout of the Fisheries Act regulations, with only 30 out of nearly 200 fish stocks currently covered.

The reopening of the cod fishery and increased quotas for capelin have raised concerns about overfishing, especially given the stocks' precarious status.

The episode highlights the need for stronger leadership and accountability in fisheries management to ensure sustainable practices.

Call to Action:

Rebecca emphasizes the importance of citizen engagement in fisheries management, encouraging listeners to stay informed and advocate for sustainable practices.

Oceana Canada aims to depoliticize fisheries management by promoting strong laws and regulations that can withstand political changes.

The episode concludes with a hopeful outlook for the future of Canadian fisheries, stressing the importance of collaboration and informed decision-making to achieve sustainable fish populations.

Link to the Report: https://oceana.ca/en/reports/fishery-audit-2024/

How do we stop over fishing? Fishing transparency is a great start. Many fisheries around the world lack the data to provide managers with the information to make better management decisions. The Coalition of Fisheries Transparency aims to work with their partners to help gain more information on each fishery. Maisie Pigeon, the Director for the Coalition, koins Andrew Lewin to discuss how transparency is made possible for fisheries. 

In this episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, host Andrew Lewin discusses fishing transparency with Maisie Pidgeon, the director of the Coalition for Fisheries Transparency. The conversation highlights the significant challenges posed by illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, which contributes to overfishing, fisheries mismanagement, and human rights abuses in the fishing sector.

Key Points:

1. Lack of Transparency: The absence of transparency measures in fisheries management leads to various problems, including overfishing and exploitation of fish stocks. Many countries struggle to manage their fisheries effectively due to insufficient data on fish populations and fishing activities.

2. Complex Stakeholder Dynamics: The fishing industry involves multiple stakeholders, including governments, the fishing industry, scientists, and conservationists. The interplay between these groups can complicate decision-making and hinder effective management.

3. The Role of the Coalition for Fisheries Transparency: The Coalition is a global network of civil society organizations advancing fisheries transparency measures. Their goal is to ensure the sustainability and equity of the fisheries sector by promoting better data sharing and management practices.

4. Benefits of Transparency: Implementing transparency measures can lead to informed decision-making, increased accountability, and improved governance in fisheries. This, in turn, can help combat IUU fishing and promote sustainable practices that protect fish stocks for future generations.

5. Global Charter for Fisheries Transparency: The Coalition operates under the Global Charter, which outlines ten policy principles to enhance fisheries transparency. These principles include requiring unique identification numbers for fishing vessels, publishing lists of licenses, and ensuring public access to fisheries data.

6. Collaborative Efforts: The Coalition works with various countries and organizations to implement transparency measures. By fostering collaboration and sharing best practices, they aim to create a global community focused on improving fisheries management.

7. Future Goals: The Coalition plans to expand its reach and influence, particularly in regions lacking fisheries management. They aim to raise awareness about the importance of transparency at international forums, such as the upcoming Our Ocean conference.

The episode emphasizes that enhancing fishing transparency is a vital step in addressing overfishing and ensuring the long-term sustainability of fish populations. By improving data collection, sharing information, and fostering collaboration among stakeholders, the Coalition for Fisheries Transparency aims to create a more equitable and sustainable fishing industry worldwide.

Connect with the Coalition for Fisheries Transparency: https://fisheriestransparency.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this episode, we delve into the ongoing challenges facing the cod fishery in Canada, drawing parallels between the current situation and the historical 1992 moratorium on cod fishing in Newfoundland and Labrador. The discussion highlights how political pressures have repeatedly overridden scientific advice regarding fishing quotas, leading to detrimental outcomes for the cod population. We examine the recent push by fisheries unions and indigenous groups to increase the fishing quota from 15,000 tons to 25,000 tons, and the subsequent decision to raise it only to 18,000 tons despite concerns from DFO scientists.

Join us as we explore the implications of these decisions and the frustrations of fishery scientists when political interests clash with environmental sustainability.

Link to article: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/cod-reopened-fisheries-ministers-1.7317359

The history of the cod fishery in Canada serves as a poignant example of how political decisions can overshadow scientific advice, leading to dire consequences for marine ecosystems and local communities. This pattern has been evident since the early days of commercial fishing in Canada, particularly with the Atlantic cod, which has been a staple of the fishing industry for centuries.

Early Days of Cod Fishing

Cod fishing in Canada dates back to before the 1800s, with Indigenous peoples relying on the abundant fish for sustenance. The fishery became increasingly industrialized in the 1950s, resulting in significant fishing pressures. As technology advanced, more fish were caught, and the population began to decline. Despite warnings from scientists at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) about the dwindling cod stocks, political leaders often prioritized the economic interests of fishermen and the fishing industry over scientific recommendations.

The 1992 Moratorium

By the late 1980s, the situation had become critical. DFO scientists consistently reported a steep decline in cod populations, advising that quotas should be reduced to allow the stocks to recover. However, politicians, influenced by the demands of fishermen and the economic implications of a reduced fishery, continued to set high quotas or even increase them. This disregard for scientific advice culminated in the 1992 moratorium on cod fishing in Newfoundland and Labrador, a drastic measure that halted the fishery entirely.

The moratorium had profound effects on the local economy and communities that depended on fishing. Many fishers were forced to abandon their traditional livelihoods, leading to significant social and economic upheaval in Newfoundland. The once-thriving fishing industry was decimated, and many individuals had to seek employment in other sectors, such as the oil and gas industry, often met with resentment and dissatisfaction.

A Pattern of Ignoring Science

Fast forward to 2016, and there were signs of recovery in the cod population. However, growth was stagnant, and scientists warned that the population remained in a cautionary zone, close to dipping back into a critical state. Despite this, political pressures resurfaced, with fisheries unions and Indigenous groups advocating for an increase in the fishing quota from 15,000 tons to 25,000 tons. The government, influenced by these stakeholders, decided to increase the quota to 18,000 tons, disregarding the cautionary advice from DFO scientists.

This recent decision reflects a troubling trend where political motivations continue to override scientific recommendations. The DFO had advised maintaining a conservative approach to ensure the long-term sustainability of the cod population, yet the government chose to prioritize immediate economic benefits over ecological stability.

Conclusion

The history of the cod fishery in Canada serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of allowing political decisions to overshadow scientific advice. The repeated pattern of ignoring scientific warnings has led to significant declines in fish populations and the devastating moratorium of 1992. As the government moves forward with increased quotas and the reopening of the commercial fishery, it is crucial to learn from past mistakes and prioritize sustainable practices that protect both the fishery and the communities that depend on it. The future of the cod fishery hinges on a balanced approach that respects scientific guidance while considering the needs of local stakeholders.

In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lewin dives into the topic of ecolabels in seafood consumption. Picture yourself enjoying a delicious sushi lunch, knowing you've made an eco-conscious choice by selecting certified sustainable seafood. Andrew discusses the importance of following organizations like Seafood Watch and the Marine Stewardship Council to ensure responsible seafood sourcing. However, he also addresses the imperfections of these ecolabels and raises critical questions about their effectiveness and future. Join the conversation as Andrew explores whether these ecolabels can improve or if we need to rethink our reliance on them.

Tune in for insights on how to better protect our oceans through informed choices.

Link to article:

Oceana article: https://oceana.org/press-releases/tuna-vessels-using-forced-labor-under-msc-ecolabel/

Natasha Nakamura article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44183-024-00074-6

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and Its Shortcomings in Tracking Forced Labor in Tuna Fisheries

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is an organization that certifies fisheries as sustainable and responsible, providing consumers with an eco-label that signifies adherence to specific environmental and ethical standards. However, recent discussions have highlighted significant shortcomings in the MSC's ability to effectively track forced labor within tuna fisheries.

Reliance on Self-Reported Information

One of the primary issues with the MSC's certification process is its reliance on self-reported information from trade associations, manufacturers, and distributors. This means that the MSC does not require direct reporting from vessel owners or operators, who are the entities where forced labor is most likely to occur. As noted in a recent podcast episode, researcher Katrina Nakamura, who analyzed data from tuna vessels, found that 74% of MSC-certified sustainable tuna was untraceable to the vessel owners or fishing employers. This lack of traceability raises serious concerns about the integrity of the MSC certification.

Lack of Monitoring and Accountability

The MSC's standards do not include provisions for monitoring the actual conditions aboard fishing vessels. There are no requirements for fisheries observers or human rights monitors to be present on these vessels, which means that the MSC is not actively verifying the claims made by the self-reporting entities. This creates a significant loophole, allowing vessels associated with human trafficking and forced labor to benefit from the MSC eco-label without any accountability.

Katrina Nakamura's research revealed that it was relatively easy for her to identify multiple cases of forced labor on vessels certified by the MSC. She highlighted that if she could find this information quickly, it is hard to believe that the MSC could be unaware of these issues. This suggests a troubling lack of diligence on the part of the MSC in ensuring that its certified fisheries are genuinely free from forced labor practices.

Implications for Consumers

For consumers, the MSC label is often seen as a guarantee of ethical and sustainable seafood. However, the findings discussed in the podcast indicate that this trust may be misplaced. The MSC has acknowledged concerns about forced labor and human rights abuses in the tuna supply chain but continues to advise consumers to choose MSC-certified tuna as a way to reduce exposure to these risks. This advice is problematic, as it does not reflect the reality of the situation, where many certified fisheries may still be complicit in labor abuses.

Call for Improvement

The podcast emphasizes the need for the MSC to implement more robust measures to protect vulnerable workers in the fishing industry. This includes requiring that vessel owners be identified and screened against publicized lists of implicated vessels, as well as establishing stricter monitoring protocols to ensure compliance with human rights standards.

In conclusion, while the MSC plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable fishing practices, its current approach to tracking forced labor within tuna fisheries is inadequate. By relying on self-reported information and failing to monitor conditions aboard vessels, the MSC risks undermining its own credibility and the trust of consumers who seek to make ethical choices in their seafood consumption. Addressing these shortcomings is essential for ensuring that the MSC can fulfill its mission of promoting sustainability and protecting human rights in the fishing industry.

The Shortcomings of Ecolabels in Tuna Fisheries: A Closer Look at Forced Labor

In a recent episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, host Andrew Lewin delves into the critical issue of forced labor within tuna fisheries, particularly focusing on the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and its certification processes. While ecolabels like the MSC are designed to assure consumers that the seafood they purchase is sustainably sourced and ethically produced, the reality is far more complex and troubling.

The Role of Ecolabels

Ecolabels serve as a guide for consumers who want to make responsible choices regarding their seafood consumption. They are intended to indicate that the seafood has been sourced from fisheries that adhere to sustainable practices and respect human rights. The MSC, for instance, certifies fisheries based on self-reported information from trade associations, manufacturers, and distributors. This system is meant to ensure that the entire supply chain—from fishing vessels to processing companies—operates under ethical standards.

The Problem of Forced Labor

However, the podcast highlights significant gaps in the MSC's reporting and monitoring processes, particularly concerning forced labor. Katrina Nakamura's recent publication in Nature reveals alarming statistics: 74% of MSC-certified sustainable tuna was found to be untraceable to the vessel owners or fishing employers. This lack of traceability raises serious questions about the conditions under which the fish are caught.

Nakamura's research indicates that approximately 128,000 fishers are trapped in forced labor aboard fishing vessels. These individuals often work under hazardous conditions, receive little to no pay, and are subjected to physical and psychological abuse. The podcast emphasizes that many of these vessels are certified by the MSC, which claims to uphold high standards for human rights and sustainability.

Self-Reporting and Accountability

One of the most concerning aspects of the MSC's certification process is its reliance on self-reported information. The podcast points out that the MSC does not screen vessels against publicized lists of labor abuses, which allows companies associated with human trafficking and forced labor to benefit from the ecolabel. This creates a loophole where unethical practices can go unchecked, undermining the very purpose of the ecolabel.

Andrew Lewin stresses that while the MSC is undertaking a monumental task in certifying fisheries globally, it must improve its standards and monitoring processes. The absence of on-board inspections and human rights observers means that the MSC is not adequately addressing the realities of forced labor in the fishing industry.

Recommendations for Improvement

To combat these issues, Oceana is advocating for world governments to adopt the Global Charter of Fisheries Transparency. This charter outlines essential policy priorities to improve fisheries management and address human rights abuses at sea. It includes measures such as collecting data on the conditions of fishing vessel crews and making this information publicly available while protecting personal identities.

In the United States, Oceana is pushing for the expansion of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) to cover all seafood imports, as currently only 45% are monitored. This expansion would help ensure that all seafood production standards, including those related to forced labor, are enforced.

Conclusion

The podcast episode serves as a wake-up call for consumers and organizations alike. While ecolabels like the MSC aim to promote sustainable and ethical seafood consumption, the reality is that significant shortcomings exist in their monitoring and reporting processes. As consumers, it is crucial to remain informed and advocate for better practices within the seafood industry. The fight against forced labor in tuna fisheries is not just about protecting the ocean; it is also about safeguarding the rights and lives of the individuals who depend on these resources for their livelihoods.

In this episode of "How to Protect the Ocean," host Andrew Lewin dives into the intricate world of fisheries management, focusing specifically on tuna fishing. Joined by Dr. Victor Restrepo from the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), the discussion revolves around the recently released report titled "Snapshot of Large-Scale Tuna Per Seine Fishing Vessels." Andrew and Victor explore key topics such as the current state of tuna fishing, the number of fishing vessels in operation, and the countries they represent. Victor shares insights on the surprising stability in vessel numbers, expressing both concern over the lack of decrease and hope for future improvements in fishing practices. Tune in to learn what types of tuna are sustainable to eat and how we can all contribute to better ocean health through informed choices.

Website: https://www.iss-foundation.org/

Tuna Fishing Annual Report: https://www.iss-foundation.org/about-issf/what-we-publish/issf-documents/issf-2024-05-a-snapshot-of-the-large-scale-tropical-tuna-purse-seine-fishing-fleets-as-of-june-2024/

The number of large-scale tuna purse seine fishing vessels has remained relatively stable over the years, consistently hovering around 650 vessels. This stability indicates a balance between fishing capacity and resource availability, which is essential for sustainable fisheries management.

Dr. Victor Restrepo, an expert in tuna fisheries management, noted that while the number of vessels has experienced slight fluctuations, there have been no significant increases or decreases. Over the past 12 years, the count has remained within the range of 640 to 670 vessels. This consistency is particularly noteworthy given the high operational costs associated with these large vessels, which can carry over 400 tons of tuna per trip and can cost between $30 to $40 million when fully equipped.

Several factors contribute to the stability in vessel numbers:

1. Economic Considerations: The substantial investment required to build and maintain these vessels means that potential operators must carefully weigh costs against expected returns from fishing, which may limit the number of new entrants into the industry.

2. Resource Limitations: Tuna fisheries are governed by quotas and regulations established by Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs). These regulations help ensure that fishing efforts do not exceed sustainable levels, maintaining a balance between the number of vessels and the available tuna stocks.

3. Conservation Measures: Organizations like the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) play a vital role in promoting sustainable practices within the industry. The ISSF has implemented conservation measures that restrict the construction of new vessels unless older ones are scrapped, helping to control fishing capacity.

4. Market Demand: While the demand for tuna, particularly in the sashimi market, remains high, there is an increasing preference for sustainably sourced products. This shift in consumer behavior encourages fishing companies to adopt sustainable practices, influencing their operational decisions regarding fleet size.

5. Monitoring and Compliance: The presence of observers on purse seine vessels, especially in tropical tuna fisheries, ensures compliance with regulations and helps monitor bycatch. This oversight can deter illegal fishing practices and promote responsible management of tuna stocks.

In summary, the relatively stable number of large-scale tuna purse seine fishing vessels reflects a complex interplay of economic, regulatory, and market factors. While this stability is a positive sign for sustainable fisheries management, ongoing efforts are necessary to ensure that tuna populations remain healthy and that fishing practices continue to evolve in response to environmental and market demands.

Understanding Tuna Fisheries Management

Tuna fisheries management is a complex and multifaceted issue involving various stakeholders, including scientists, fishing companies, processing companies, and regulatory bodies. In a recent episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, Dr. Victor Restrepo from the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) provided valuable insights into the current state of tuna fisheries, the challenges they face, and the efforts being made to ensure sustainability.

The Importance of Tuna Species

Tuna is a significant fishery resource, comprising three main species of bluefin tuna and 23 stocks of major commercial tunas. Although bluefin tuna accounts for only 1% of the total catch, it generates 99% of the media attention due to its high market value, particularly in the sashimi market. An individual bluefin tuna can fetch prices as high as $70,000 to $100,000, leading to illegal fishing and overfishing in the past. However, since 2009, management practices have improved, and many stocks are showing signs of recovery.

Fishing Methods and Bycatch Concerns

The primary method for catching tuna is purse seining, where a large net encircles a school of fish, allowing for significant catches. While this method is efficient, it has raised concerns about bycatch, particularly in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, where dolphins often associate with tuna schools. The podcast highlighted the importance of distinguishing between different fishing practices and their impacts, noting that not all tuna fisheries face the same challenges.

Regulatory Framework and Challenges

Tuna fisheries are managed by Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs), which are responsible for setting quotas and regulations. However, a significant challenge arises from the fact that many vessels are authorized to fish in multiple RFMOs, complicating global management efforts. Dr. Restrepo expressed frustration over the lack of a unified system to manage fishing capacity across different regions, which can lead to overcapacity and increased fishing pressure.

The Role of ISSF and Market Influence

The ISSF plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable tuna fishing practices by collaborating with processing companies to implement science-driven conservation measures. These measures aim to reduce bycatch, limit the use of harmful fishing gear, and ensure that new vessels are not added without scrapping older ones. The podcast emphasized the importance of market demand in driving these changes, as processing companies are increasingly committed to sourcing tuna from sustainable fisheries.

Consumer Awareness and Action

One of the key takeaways from the episode is the role of consumers in promoting sustainable fishing practices. By becoming more knowledgeable about tuna fisheries and making informed purchasing decisions, consumers can support responsible fisheries and encourage better practices within the industry. Dr. Restrepo highlighted that education is the first step, and consumers can reward fisheries that are doing well while avoiding those that are not.

Conclusion

Tuna fisheries management is a complex issue that requires collaboration among various stakeholders, including scientists, regulatory bodies, and the fishing industry. While there have been significant improvements in management practices and the recovery of certain stocks, challenges remain, particularly regarding overcapacity and bycatch. Organizations like the ISSF are working to bridge the gap between science and industry, promoting sustainable practices that benefit both the environment and the economy. As consumers, we have the power to influence these practices through our choices, making it essential to stay informed and engaged in the conversation about tuna fisheries and ocean conservation.

Consumer awareness and education play a crucial role in promoting sustainable fishing practices, particularly in the context of tuna fisheries. As highlighted in the podcast episode with Dr. Victor Restrepo, informed consumer choices can significantly impact the fishing industry by rewarding responsible fisheries and encouraging better management of tuna stocks.

The Importance of Consumer Knowledge

Dr. Restrepo emphasizes that education is the first step toward making informed decisions about seafood consumption. When consumers understand the complexities of tuna fishing, including the various species, fishing methods, and the environmental impacts associated with them, they are better equipped to choose sustainably sourced products. This knowledge empowers consumers to support fisheries that adhere to responsible practices, thereby incentivizing those fisheries to maintain sustainable operations.

Rewarding Responsible Fisheries

By opting for tuna products that are certified as sustainable or sourced from fisheries that follow best practices, consumers can create a demand for responsible fishing. This demand encourages fisheries to adopt better management strategies, such as reducing bycatch and adhering to quotas. As Dr. Restrepo notes, the involvement of processing companies that prioritize sustainability has led to significant changes in the industry. These companies often require their suppliers to meet specific conservation measures, which can include 100% observer coverage on fishing vessels, as seen in the Indian Ocean.

Encouraging Better Management of Tuna Stocks

The podcast also discusses the role of organizations like the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) in promoting science-driven management of tuna stocks. The ISSF works with processing companies to implement conservation measures that not only protect tuna populations but also enhance the overall health of marine ecosystems. When consumers support these initiatives through their purchasing decisions, they contribute to a larger movement that advocates for sustainable fisheries management.

Conclusion

In summary, consumer awareness and education are vital for fostering sustainable fishing practices. By making informed choices, consumers can reward fisheries that operate responsibly and encourage the adoption of better management practices for tuna stocks. As the podcast illustrates, the collective efforts of consumers, processing companies, and organizations like the ISSF can lead to meaningful change in the fishing industry, ensuring that tuna remains a viable resource for future generations.

Today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast celebrates a conservation success story focusing on the Pacific bluefin tuna. Thanks to an international effort, the species has rebounded from the brink of extinction, with a recent stock assessment showing a significant increase in the number of reproductive females. Host Andrew Lewin dives into what led to this success, highlighting the importance of effective management and quick action. Join the discussion on this remarkable turnaround and learn how collective efforts can make a positive impact on marine conservation.

Link to articles:
1) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/pacific-bluefin-tuna-decade-long-conservation-success-jamie-gibbon-1nxgf/?trackingId=8wx3X8huMkgmyeL7LAal%2Bg%3D%3D
2) https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/overfished-sustainable-harvests-pacific-bluefin-tuna-rebound-new-highs

The Pacific bluefin tuna population has seen a significant increase in the number of female tuna capable of reproductive success, indicating a successful conservation effort. The recent stock assessment revealed a substantial rise in the population of female Pacific bluefin tuna able to reproduce, showing that international efforts to protect and manage the species have been effective in reversing the decline and promoting population growth.

This success story highlights the severe threats faced by the Pacific bluefin tuna population due to overfishing, with the stock plummeting by over 96% from its historic high. Despite these challenges, there has been a notable turnaround in the population status, particularly in increasing the number of reproductive females, a crucial milestone in the conservation of this species.

The conservation success of the Pacific bluefin tuna demonstrates that with dedicated efforts and effective management strategies, it is possible to reverse the decline of marine species and promote their recovery. The increase in the number of reproductive females is a positive sign for the future sustainability of the Pacific bluefin tuna population.

The significant rise in the number of female Pacific bluefin tuna capable of reproductive success showcases the effectiveness of conservation efforts and emphasizes the importance of continued collaboration and conservation measures to ensure the long-term survival of this iconic species.

The overfishing of Pacific bluefin tuna had devastating consequences, leading to a staggering 96% drop in population from its historic high. This drastic decline highlighted the urgent need for immediate and effective conservation measures to prevent the species from facing extinction. The episode discusses how a scientific report in 2012 revealed the alarming state of the Pacific bluefin tuna population, emphasizing the severe impact of overfishing on the species.

The significant decrease in the Pacific bluefin tuna population served as a wake-up call, indicating that urgent action was required to reverse the trend of depletion. The episode mentions how the exploitation of these large and valuable fish for commercial purposes, such as the celebratory auction where a Japanese sushi chain purchased a bluefin tuna for $1.7 million, demonstrated how financial interests often outweighed conservation concerns.

The episode also touches upon the slow growth and long lifespan of tuna species, making their recovery a lengthy and challenging process. The conservation success story of the Pacific bluefin tuna serves as a beacon of hope, showcasing that with coordinated international efforts and effective management strategies, it is possible to reverse the decline of overexploited marine species. This success story underscores the importance of implementing sustainable fishing practices and conservation measures to protect vulnerable marine species like the Pacific bluefin tuna.

The episode highlights the exploitation of endangered tuna species by corporations for profit, noting how the value of individual tuna species can increase as they become more endangered. This phenomenon occurs because the scarcity of a species drives up its market value, making each individual catch more lucrative for those involved in the fishing industry.

In the case of the Pacific bluefin tuna, despite facing a significant decline in population due to overfishing, there were instances where a Japanese sushi chain purchased a bluefin tuna for a staggering $1.7 million in a celebratory auction. This exorbitant price tag demonstrates how the demand for these endangered species can lead to inflated prices, creating a financial incentive for exploitation.

Furthermore, the episode mentions a common practice where corporations catch endangered tuna species, freeze them for extended periods, and then sell them at a higher price when the species is on the brink of extinction. This strategy essentially turns the exploitation of endangered species into an investment opportunity for these corporations, prioritizing short-term profits over the long-term sustainability of marine ecosystems.

The documentary "End of the Line," referenced in the episode, provides further insight into the exploitation of tuna species for profit. It delves into the practices of the tuna industry in various regions, shedding light on the detrimental impact of overfishing and the commodification of endangered species.

Overall, the episode underscores the alarming trend where the increasing rarity of certain tuna species can paradoxically drive their commercial value up, leading to their exploitation by corporations solely for financial gain. This highlights the urgent need for robust conservation measures and sustainable fishing practices to protect these vulnerable marine species from further exploitation and potential extinction.

This episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast discusses a new report by the Food and Agriculture Organization revealing that more seafood is now farmed than caught in the wild. Despite this shift, overfishing continues to be a problem and sustainable fish stocks are declining. Andrew Lewin, highlights the importance of staying informed about ocean issues and taking action to protect marine life. 

Past episodes: 

Aquaculture in 2022: What you need to know: https://www.speakupforblue.com/show/speak-up-for-the-ocean-blue/aquaculture-in-2022-what-you-need-to-know/

The educational importance of the Salmon People Podcast: https://www.speakupforblue.com/show/speak-up-for-the-ocean-blue/the-educational-importance-of-the-salmon-people-podcast/

One of the key points discussed in the podcast episode is the significant shift in seafood production, where more seafood is now farmed than caught in the wild for the first time. This shift highlights the growing importance of aquaculture in meeting the global demand for seafood. However, despite this shift, the challenges of overfishing and the decline in sustainable fish stocks continue to persist.

The increase in aquaculture production signifies a shift towards more controlled and sustainable methods of seafood production. Aquaculture has the potential to enhance global nutrition and provide a reliable source of protein for a growing population. This shift is crucial in ensuring food security and meeting the dietary needs of communities around the world.

On the other hand, the ongoing issues of overfishing and the decline in sustainable fish stocks underscore the importance of effective fisheries management. Despite the rise in aquaculture, overfishing remains a pressing concern that threatens marine ecosystems and the livelihoods of those dependent on wild fish populations.

The FAO's Blue Transformation Strategy aims to address these challenges by improving the sustainability of aquaculture and fisheries management. The strategy emphasizes the need for political commitment, investment, and effective governance to ensure the long-term health of marine resources.

Overall, the podcast episode highlights the complex dynamics of seafood production, where aquaculture plays an increasingly significant role in meeting global demand. However, the persistence of overfishing and the decline in sustainable fish stocks serve as a reminder of the ongoing challenges that must be addressed to ensure the health and sustainability of our oceans.

The FAO's Blue Transformation Strategy is a key initiative aimed at enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture by tackling various challenges in fisheries management, political commitment, and investment. The strategy recognizes the importance of addressing these issues to ensure the long-term viability of aquaculture practices and the health of aquatic ecosystems.

Fisheries Management: The FAO's strategy emphasizes the need for improved fisheries management practices to prevent overfishing and ensure the sustainable use of aquatic resources. By implementing effective management strategies, such as setting catch limits and implementing ecosystem-based approaches, the FAO aims to promote the responsible stewardship of marine resources.

Political Commitment: Political commitment plays a crucial role in driving sustainable aquaculture practices. The FAO's strategy calls for increased political will to prioritize the conservation of aquatic ecosystems and the promotion of sustainable fishing practices. By engaging policymakers and decision-makers, the FAO aims to create a conducive environment for the implementation of policies that support sustainable aquaculture.

Investment: Adequate investment is essential for the development and advancement of sustainable aquaculture practices. The FAO's strategy highlights the importance of investing in research, technology, and infrastructure to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of aquaculture operations. By attracting investments from both public and private sectors, the FAO aims to foster innovation and growth in the aquaculture industry.

Overall, the FAO's Blue Transformation Strategy serves as a comprehensive framework for improving the sustainability of aquaculture by addressing key challenges in fisheries management, political commitment, and investment. Through concerted efforts and collaboration, the FAO aims to promote the responsible and sustainable use of aquatic resources for the benefit of both present and future generations.

One of the key points highlighted in the podcast episode is the urgent need for action to replicate successful policies and reverse declining sustainability trends in fisheries management. The episode emphasizes that despite some improvements, there are still significant challenges facing global fisheries and aquaculture.

The report discussed in the episode reveals that sustainably fished marine fish stocks have declined to 62% from a previous high of 90% in the 1970s. This downward trend is concerning, especially considering the importance of maintaining sustainable fish stocks for both environmental and economic reasons.

To address this issue, it is crucial to replicate successful policies that have proven effective in promoting sustainability in fisheries management. By learning from and drawing inspiration from initiatives that have achieved genuine sustainability, it is possible to reverse the declining trends and ensure the long-term health of marine ecosystems.

The podcast also mentions the importance of investing in better data collection and monitoring efforts to improve the understanding of fish stocks and their sustainability status. By dedicating resources to gathering accurate information, policymakers and stakeholders can make informed decisions to manage fisheries more sustainably.

Furthermore, the episode underscores the need for increased political will, both at the national and international levels, to prioritize sustainable fisheries management. Collaboration between governments, organizations, and industry stakeholders is essential to implement effective policies and regulations that support sustainable fishing practices.

In conclusion, urgent action is required to address the declining sustainability trends in fisheries management. By replicating successful policies, investing in data collection and monitoring, and fostering political commitment, it is possible to reverse the negative trajectory and ensure the future viability of global fisheries.

On this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, we dive into how AI technology is being used to combat illegal fishing, ultimately reducing the risks migrants from Africa face when crossing into Europe. Discover the innovative work of Dyhia Belhabib from Algeria, who has revolutionized enforcement against illegal fishing practices. Tune in to learn more about the impact of her efforts.

Link to the article: https://www.popsci.com/technology/ai-marine-conservation/

AI technology is revolutionizing the fight against illegal fishing activities, a critical issue with far-reaching implications beyond marine conservation. As highlighted in the podcast episode, individuals like Dahia Belhabib showcase how AI can effectively combat illegal fishing. By developing sophisticated AI-powered databases like Spyglass and utilizing tools such as the GRACE AI risk assessment tool, authorities can now track vessel movements in real-time and predict the likelihood of environmental crimes at sea.

Reducing illegal fishing activities is crucial not only for protecting marine ecosystems but also for the livelihoods of artisanal fishers in African countries. These fishers rely on sustainable fishing practices to support their families, and illegal fishing depletes fish stocks, leaving them without a viable source of income. This often leads to dangerous migration of African migrants to other countries, risking their lives on overcrowded boats.

By leveraging AI technology to crack down on illegal fishing, the goal is to create a more sustainable fishing industry that allows local fishers to thrive in their communities. Preserving fish stocks through effective enforcement enables artisanal fishers to continue their traditional practices and provide for their families without needing to migrate for better opportunities. This not only safeguards marine biodiversity but also addresses the root causes of migration, ultimately reducing the risks associated with dangerous migration routes.

The use of AI technology in monitoring and tracking illegal fishing activities is a powerful tool in the global fight against this issue. By enhancing surveillance capabilities and enabling real-time data analysis, authorities can more effectively detect and apprehend rogue fishing vessels. This proactive approach not only protects marine resources but also contributes to the safety and well-being of African migrants who might otherwise undertake perilous journeys in search of a better life.

Dahiya Belhabib, a remarkable woman from Algeria, has made significant strides in combating illegal fishing by harnessing the power of artificial intelligence (AI). Belhabib's innovative approach involves creating a comprehensive database to monitor criminal activities of industrial fishing vessels. This database, known as Spyglass, is the world's largest registry of criminal history related to illegal fishing operations.

Belhabib's journey began with her doctoral research, which revealed the alarming extent of illegal fishing activities supplying Chinese and European markets. Recognizing the urgent need for action, she established the Spyglass database. This initiative has revolutionized the enforcement of illegal fishing laws by providing real-time tracking of vessel movements and identifying potential environmental crimes at sea.

Through her collaboration with co-founder Sogol Godin, Belhabib developed an AI-powered risk assessment tool named GRACE, in honor of the pioneering coder Grace Hopper. This tool predicts the likelihood of environmental crimes committed by vessels, enabling authorities to take proactive measures against illegal fishing activities. By leveraging AI technology and customized monitoring systems, Belhabib's efforts have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of policing marine crimes and criminal vessels.

Belhabib's dedication and entrepreneurial spirit have transformed marine conservation and paved the way for a more sustainable future. Her work exemplifies the impact individuals can have in safeguarding oceans and protecting ecosystems. Through her pioneering use of AI, Belhabib continues to lead the charge in combating illegal fishing and preserving marine biodiversity for future generations.

The Role of AI in Enhancing Illegal Fishing Monitoring and Enforcement

The episode highlights the groundbreaking work of Dahia Belhabib, who has leveraged AI technology to combat illegal fishing activities. By combining AI with real-time data processing, Belhabib has revolutionized the tracking and monitoring of illegal fishing vessels. This innovative approach has the potential to significantly enhance enforcement efforts and ultimately lead to the elimination of illegal fishing in the future.

Belhabib's creation of the Marine Crimes database, powered by AI algorithms like Ada and GRACE, has enabled the tracking of vessel movements in real-time. By utilizing signals from marine traffic transponders and other monitoring technologies, her team can predict the risk of environmental crimes at sea. This proactive approach allows for the identification of vessels engaged in illegal fishing activities, providing law enforcement agencies with the necessary information to intervene promptly.

Moreover, the collaboration with organizations like Global Fishing Watch and the use of satellite imagery have further strengthened monitoring capabilities. By visualizing global fishing activities and sharing data in near real-time, authorities can target suspect vessels and apprehend rogue fishing operations. This comprehensive approach, backed by advanced AI technology, has the potential to transform the landscape of illegal fishing enforcement.

The episode emphasizes the importance of AI in processing vast amounts of data efficiently and accurately. With the ability to analyze and interpret data in real-time, AI technology can facilitate quicker decision-making and response to illegal fishing incidents. By triangulating vessel positions and predicting routes, authorities can enhance their surveillance efforts and increase the likelihood of apprehending illegal fishing vessels.

Overall, the integration of AI with real-time data processing represents a significant advancement in the fight against illegal fishing. By harnessing the power of technology to track, monitor, and enforce regulations, stakeholders can work towards the ultimate goal of eliminating illegal fishing activities. Dahia Belhabib's pioneering work serves as a testament to the transformative potential of AI in marine conservation and enforcement efforts.

Andrew Lewin welcomes marine scientist Rebecca Schijns from Oceana Canada to discuss the state of Northern Cod and Capelin stocks. They delve into the challenges facing these fish populations and explore ways for citizens to take action to help move the fishery from a critical zone to a healthy one.

Tune in to learn more about the importance of protecting our oceans and how you can make a difference.

Andrew Lewin dives into the current status of the Northern Cod stock, focusing on Newfoundland and Labrador in Canada. The episode explores the history of the stock, including the moratorium in the early 1990s and subsequent efforts by organizations like WWF to revive it. Listeners will gain insights into the challenges faced by the Northern Cod stock and what can be done to protect and restore this important fishery.

Link to the articles:
1) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/northern-cod-stock-assessment-1.7156719

2) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/dfo-capelin-stock-assessment-nl-2023-1.6779681

The Northern Cod stock has long been a concern, consistently remaining in a critical or cautious zone. This status underscores the urgent need for careful management and conservation efforts to ensure the recovery and sustainability of the Northern Cod population.

The history of the Northern Cod stock shows a decline that led to a fishing moratorium in the early 1990s. Despite ongoing monitoring and assessment efforts, the population has struggled to rebound. DFO Science's stock assessments consistently place the Northern Cod stock in a critical or cautious zone, indicating the fragile state of the population.

The sensitivity of the Northern Cod stock highlights the importance of effective management strategies and conservation measures. Collaboration between government agencies, nonprofit organizations like WWF, and fisheries unions is crucial in addressing the challenges faced by the Northern Cod stock. These stakeholders work together to gather and analyze data, advocate for sustainable fishing practices, and ensure the long-term viability of the fishery.

The ongoing debate surrounding factors impacting the Northern Cod stock, such as climate change and seal populations, further emphasizes the need for comprehensive management and conservation efforts. The variability in stock assessments and the inclusion of new data highlight the complexity of managing a fishery with a troubled history like the Northern Cod.

In conclusion, the extended presence of the Northern Cod stock in a critical or cautious zone serves as a reminder of the importance of prioritizing conservation and sustainable management practices. By continuing to collaborate, gather accurate data, and implement effective conservation measures, stakeholders can work towards the recovery and resilience of the Northern Cod population.

The podcast episode highlights the ongoing debate and collaboration between government, nonprofit organizations, and fisheries unions to ensure sustainable fishing practices while protecting the environment. It emphasizes the importance of these stakeholders working together to address the challenges faced by fisheries, particularly in the case of the Northern Cod stock.

• Government Involvement: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) plays a crucial role in conducting stock assessments and making decisions regarding fishing regulations. The government is responsible for implementing policies that aim to protect fish stocks and ensure sustainable fishing practices. However, the episode also acknowledges that there have been instances where political decisions have not aligned with scientific recommendations, leading to negative impacts on fish stocks.

• Nonprofit Organizations: Organizations like WWF and Oceana Canada are actively involved in advocating for better data collection, improved stock assessments, and sustainable fishing practices. These organizations put pressure on the government to prioritize environmental protection and ensure that decisions are based on sound scientific evidence. Their involvement highlights the importance of external oversight and advocacy in promoting sustainable fisheries management.

• Fisheries Unions: The fisheries unions, such as the Fish, Food and Allied Workers (FFAW) union, represent the interests of fishers and their communities. These unions play a crucial role in ensuring that the voices of fishers are heard in decision-making processes. They provide valuable insights based on their knowledge and experience in the industry, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by fishers.

• Collaboration and Debate: While there may be tensions and disagreements at times, the episode emphasizes that collaboration between government, nonprofit organizations, and fisheries unions is essential for finding solutions to complex fisheries management issues. By working together, these stakeholders can leverage their respective expertise and perspectives to develop more effective and sustainable fishing practices. The ongoing debate and collaboration serve as a mechanism for ensuring that decisions are well-informed and considerate of both environmental conservation and the livelihoods of fishers.

Overall, the episode underscores the importance of a multi-stakeholder approach to fisheries management, where government, nonprofit organizations, and fisheries unions collaborate to achieve a balance between economic interests and environmental sustainability. This collaborative effort is essential for addressing the challenges faced by fisheries and working towards long-term solutions that benefit both marine ecosystems and coastal communities.

One key takeaway from the podcast episode on the Northern Cod stock is the critical importance of including accurate and representative data in fisheries stock assessments. The episode highlighted how the Northern Cod stock has been in a critical or cautious zone for an extended period, indicating the need for precise data to make informed decisions about the future of fish stocks.

The episode discussed how the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) conducts stock assessments to determine the health of fish populations, such as the Northern Cod and Kaplan. These assessments play a crucial role in guiding fisheries management decisions, including setting fishing quotas and implementing conservation measures.

The inclusion of accurate and representative data in these assessments is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures that the assessments provide a true reflection of the current status of fish stocks. Inaccurate or incomplete data can lead to misleading conclusions, potentially resulting in unsustainable fishing practices that harm fish populations.

Moreover, the episode highlighted the complexity of fisheries modeling and the need for data accuracy to improve predictability and reduce variability in stock assessments. By including the right data, scientists can better understand the factors influencing fish populations, such as environmental changes, predation, and fishing pressure.

The episode also touched upon the collaboration between various stakeholders, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations like WWF, and fisheries unions, in advocating for the inclusion of more data in stock assessments. This collaboration underscores the shared goal of ensuring the sustainability of fish stocks while supporting the livelihoods of fishers.

In conclusion, the episode emphasized the critical role of accurate and representative data in fisheries stock assessments to make informed decisions for the future of fish stocks. By prioritizing data quality and collaboration among stakeholders, we can work towards sustainable fisheries management practices that protect marine ecosystems and support thriving fish populations.

Andrew Lewin delves into the story of a fishery union in Newfoundland blocking the government from passing their budget. The union's protest revolves around issues with crab fishing, prices, and sales restrictions, sparking a significant public demonstration. Join Andrew as he uncovers the complexities of the situation and explores how individuals can advocate for ocean protection and sustainable fishing practices.

Link to article: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nl-fishery-protest-forces-budget-delay-1.7149423

Fishermen in Newfoundland are currently protesting for the freedom to sell fish at their desired price and to any species of fish, rather than being constrained by government regulations. The primary issue at hand revolves around the crab fishing industry in Newfoundland, particularly the snow crab fishery. Currently, fishermen are required to sell their catch to Newfoundland processors at a set price, with restrictions preventing them from selling outside the province or country. This lack of competition in the market allows processing plants to dictate prices, leaving fishermen with limited control over their earnings.

The fishermen are advocating for free enterprise, aiming to have the autonomy to set their own prices and sell to a broader market. By being able to sell their catch at their preferred price and to a wider range of species, fishermen believe they can secure better margins and ensure a more sustainable livelihood. The desire for free enterprise stems from the frustration of having to adhere to government-mandated pricing and limited selling options, which hinders their ability to make a profit that covers their operational costs and provides a sustainable income.

The protest highlights the longstanding tension between fishermen and the government in Newfoundland, dating back to the Cod moratorium in the early 1990s. The collapse of the Cod fishery had a significant impact on the economy and fishing communities in Newfoundland, leading to a lack of trust between fishermen and the government. The current protest reflects a broader struggle for autonomy and fair treatment within the fishing industry, emphasizing the importance of empowering fishermen to have more control over their businesses and economic outcomes.

The issue raised by the Newfoundland fishermen underscores the complexities of fisheries management and the need for a balance between conservation efforts and supporting the livelihoods of those dependent on fishing. By allowing fishermen the freedom to set their own prices and expand their market reach, it could potentially lead to a more sustainable and equitable fishing industry in Newfoundland.

The fishing industry, particularly in Newfoundland, is facing significant challenges due to monopolies in processing plants dictating prices. Fishers are finding their ability to set their own margins severely limited, impacting their livelihoods and the sustainability of the industry.

In the episode, it was highlighted that fishers in Newfoundland, particularly crab fishermen, are facing restrictions on where they can sell their catch and at what price. Currently, they are required to sell their catch to Newfoundland processors at a set price, with no option to sell outside the province or country. This lack of competition allows processing plants to dictate prices, leaving fishers at a significant disadvantage.

The issue of monopolies in processing plants not only affects the income of fishers but also hinders their ability to cover costs associated with fishing, such as boat maintenance, fuel, and gear expenses. Without the freedom to set their own prices based on market demand, fishers are left with little control over their profit margins, making it challenging to sustain their businesses.

The situation in Newfoundland reflects a broader problem within the fishing industry, where processing plants hold significant power over fishers, impacting their economic stability and autonomy. The call for free enterprise and the ability to sell seafood at competitive prices is crucial for the long-term sustainability of the fishing industry and the livelihoods of fishers.

Addressing the issue of monopolies in processing plants is essential to ensure fair compensation for fishers, promote competition in the market, and support the economic viability of fishing communities. By allowing fishers the freedom to set their own prices and explore diverse market opportunities, the industry can move towards a more equitable and sustainable future.

Negotiations and regulations in the fishing industry play a crucial role in ensuring fair compensation for fishers and protecting the environment. As discussed in the podcast episode, the fishing industry, particularly in Newfoundland, has faced challenges with regulations that limit the ability of fishers to sell their catch at fair prices. The current system restricts fishers to selling their catch to specific processing plants at set prices, leading to concerns about lack of competition and unfair pricing practices.

Improving negotiations and regulations in the fishing industry is essential to address these issues. Fishers, like the crab fishermen in Newfoundland, are advocating for the freedom to sell their catch at prices that reflect the true value of their efforts and investments. By allowing fishers to sell their catch outside the province and even internationally, they can access a broader market and potentially secure better prices for their products.

Moreover, enhancing regulations to promote fair competition among processing plants can help prevent monopolistic practices that dictate prices to fishers. By giving fishers more control over their catch and pricing, they can operate their businesses more effectively and sustainably. This can lead to better livelihoods for fishers and a more equitable distribution of profits within the industry.

In addition to ensuring fair compensation for fishers, improving regulations in the fishing industry is crucial for environmental protection. Sustainable fishing practices are essential to maintain healthy fish stocks and preserve marine ecosystems. By implementing regulations that promote sustainable fishing methods and responsible resource management, the industry can contribute to long-term environmental conservation.

Overall, the podcast episode highlights the importance of reevaluating and enhancing negotiations and regulations in the fishing industry to achieve a balance between economic viability, fair compensation for fishers, and environmental sustainability. By addressing these aspects, the industry can move towards a more equitable and environmentally conscious future.

Andrew Lewin discusses the issue of trawling and the challenges it poses for the government of India. Despite growing concerns about the negative impact of trawling on the environment, the Indian government has been slow to enforce bans on the practice. This is especially problematic as more countries are implementing bans within their exclusive economic zones, leading to Indian fishermen being caught for illegal fishing. The episode explores the historical push towards trawling in India and the need to transition away from this harmful practice.

Tune in to learn more about the impact of trawling and what can be done to protect the ocean.

Link to article: https://theprint.in/environment/whats-bottom-trawling-the-new-flashpoint-between-india-sri-lanka-and-why-its-still-rampant-in-india/1962236/

Trawling is a widely used fishing method by commercial fishermen and fishing communities, but it is also highly destructive, causing significant harm to the ocean's health and biodiversity. This practice involves dragging a large net equipped with doors and a chain along the bottom of the ocean, capturing everything in its path.

One major concern with trawling is its impact on biodiversity. The scraping of the ocean floor destroys habitats like sponge reefs and soft coral reefs, which take a long time to regenerate. These habitats provide crucial shelter and food sources for many marine species. Additionally, trawling often results in high levels of bycatch, where non-target species and juvenile fish are caught and discarded. This disrupts ecosystem balance and leads to declines in vulnerable species populations.

The negative effects of trawling extend beyond the immediate area. This practice can release large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. It also disturbs sediment on the ocean floor, releasing stored carbon and contributing to ocean acidification.

Despite the known environmental impacts, trawling continues to be extensively practiced in many parts of the world, including India. In fact, over 52% of India's total fishing catch comes from trawl nets. While the government has implemented some measures, such as seasonal bans, enforcement of these regulations is often lacking. This is partly due to historical support for trawling as a major source of fish for the country.

To address the destructive nature of trawling, alternatives have been proposed. Increasing the mesh size of trawl nets allows juvenile fish and non-target species to escape, reducing bycatch. Efforts have also been made to transition fishermen to more sustainable fishing methods. For example, the Blue Revolution scheme in India aims to replace trawling boats with deep-sea fishing boats that use targeted methods like gill nets and tuna longlining, which do not damage the seabed.

In conclusion, trawling is a highly destructive fishing method that poses significant threats to the ocean's health and biodiversity. It destroys habitats, causes high levels of bycatch, and contributes to climate change and ocean acidification. Efforts to reduce the impact of trawling include increasing mesh sizes, implementing seasonal bans, and transitioning fishermen to more sustainable fishing methods. However, further action and enforcement are needed to protect the ocean from the harmful effects of trawling.

The government of India has historically supported trawling as a major source of fish for the country, despite increasing bans on trawling in other countries. According to the podcast episode, India has a long-standing push towards trawling as a means of bringing in fish for the country. This can be attributed to various factors, including the government's subsidies for mechanized trawlers, engines, and fuel since the 1950s. These subsidies have incentivized fishermen to engage in trawling as it is a more efficient method of fishing.

However, the episode highlights that trawling is facing increasing bans in many countries, including neighboring countries like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and Madagascar. These bans are implemented due to the detrimental impacts of trawling on the environment, such as the destruction of bottom habitats and high levels of bycatch. Despite these bans, Indian fishermen continue to engage in trawling, leading to conflicts with other countries and arrests for illegal fishing.

The podcast episode suggests that the government's historical support for trawling and the economic obligations of fishermen contribute to the continued practice of trawling in India. Many fishermen have taken loans to purchase trawlers and are bound by economic obligations that force them to continue trawling to repay their debts and support their families. The bans on trawling in certain seasons and areas have not been effectively enforced, allowing fishermen to continue their operations.

To address the issue, the Indian government has started implementing measures to transition fishermen away from trawling. Programs like the Blue Revolution scheme and the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana aim to replace trawling boats with deep-sea fishing boats that utilize targeted fishing methods like gill nets and tuna longlining. These methods do not involve bottom trawling and have fewer impacts on the seabed.

However, the transition away from trawling is a complex process that requires significant time, effort, and financial resources. With over 30,000 mechanized trawlers in India, it is challenging to buy out all the trawlers and provide alternative livelihood options for fishermen. Additionally, proper implementation of existing laws, surveillance mechanisms, and monitoring of trawling vessels are crucial to control illegal trawling activities.

In conclusion, despite increasing bans on trawling in other countries, the government of India has historically supported trawling as a major source of fish for the country. Economic obligations and the lack of effective enforcement of bans contribute to the continued practice of trawling by Indian fishermen. However, the government has initiated programs to transition fishermen away from trawling and towards more sustainable fishing methods. The transition process requires careful planning, financial support, and effective enforcement of regulations to ensure the conservation of marine ecosystems.

Indian fishermen continue to engage in trawling due to economic obligations and the lack of viable alternatives. Trawling has been a major source of income for many fishing communities in India, with 52% of India's total fishing catch coming from trawl nets. The government has historically supported trawling by offering subsidies for mechanized trawlers, engines, and fuel. This has made trawling an attractive option for fishermen, despite its destructive impact on the ocean's health.

However, efforts are being made to transition to more sustainable fishing practices. The Blue Revolution scheme by the Department of Fisheries and the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana are two initiatives aimed at replacing trawling boats with deep-sea fishing boats. Deep-sea fishing involves techniques like gill nets and tuna longlining, which are targeted methods of fishing that do not touch the seabed. While these methods have their own challenges, they are considered less destructive compared to bottom trawling.

The government's initiatives have already resulted in the distribution of 800 deep-sea fishing boats to fishermen in Tamil Nadu. This transition is a step towards reducing the reliance on trawling and promoting more sustainable fishing practices. However, the cost of buying and maintaining trawling boats is a significant barrier for many fishermen. Loans and economic obligations force them to continue trawling, even if they want to explore alternative methods.

To address this issue, it is crucial to provide financial support and training to fishermen to help them transition away from trawling. Subsidies and buyout programs can assist fishermen in purchasing new boats and equipment for sustainable fishing practices. Additionally, training programs can educate fishermen on alternative fishing methods and sustainable aquaculture practices.

Enforcement of existing laws and regulations is also essential to control trawling. Surveillance mechanisms and monitoring of trawling vessels should be implemented to ensure compliance with bans and restrictions. International cooperation is also necessary to prevent fishermen from trespassing into other countries' exclusive economic zones and engaging in illegal trawling.

Overall, while the transition away from trawling may take time and effort, the government's initiatives and support from the fishing community are crucial steps towards promoting sustainable fishing practices in India. By providing viable alternatives and addressing economic obligations, it is possible to reduce the reliance on trawling and protect the health of the ocean.

In this episode, we explore the destructive impact of trawling, an unsustainable fishing method that is contributing to overfishing and the degradation of the ocean. We discuss how trawling destroys the ocean floor and its potential effects on climate change. Additionally, we delve into a new study that reveals the significant carbon release associated with bottom trawling. This episode highlights the urgent need to address the environmental consequences of fishing practices and offers insights on how individuals can take action to protect the ocean.

Link to article: 

Andrew Lewin discusses how the UK government is setting catch limits for fish populations above what scientific advice recommends. He explains the importance of following scientific advice to ensure sustainable fishing practices and prevent overfishing. Andrew also highlights the negative consequences of ignoring scientific advice, using the example of the collapse of the cod fishery in Canada. He emphasizes the need for governments to prioritize conservation and make decisions based on the best available science.

Link to article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/21/conservationists-take-uk-to-court-for-illegally-squandering-fish-stocks

In this episode of the podcast, the host discusses the importance of governments listening to scientific advice and setting conservative catch limits to ensure the long-term sustainability of fish stocks. The host highlights the example of the Canadian government's mismanagement of cod stocks, which led to the collapse of the fishery and devastating consequences for the fishing community. Despite the advice of fishery scientists, the government continued to set catch limits above the recommended levels, resulting in a depletion of the population. The host emphasizes that following scientific advice and setting conservative catch limits is crucial to prevent overfishing and maintain healthy fish populations. The recent case of the UK government setting catch limits above scientific advice is also mentioned, with conservationists challenging the government's actions in court. The host argues that ignoring scientific advice and setting higher catch limits undermines conservation efforts and puts fish stocks at risk. It is suggested that governments should work with the fishing community to find a balance between sustainable fishing practices and livelihoods, while prioritizing the long-term health of fish populations. Overall, the episode emphasizes the need for governments to prioritize scientific advice and take proactive measures to protect and sustain fish stocks.

Canadian fish stocks are in trouble. Andrew Lewin and Oceana's Rebecca Schijns discuss the importance of fisheries audits and the state of Canada's fisheries. Joined by fishery scientist Rebecca Schijns from Oceana Canada, they delve into the results of the audits and the need for conservation efforts. Rebecca shares the results of Oceana's 7th Annual Fishery Audit for Canadian fish stocks.

Tune in to learn more about the challenges and solutions for safeguarding Canada's fisheries.

Oceana Canada's Fishery Audit: https://oceana.ca/en/reports/fishery-audit-2023/

The organization highlighted in the episode emphasizes the significance of collaborating with communities and valuing input from community leaders. They believe that engaging with community leadership and sharing their findings is crucial, as it allows them to address any questions or concerns and ensure that their recommendations for rebuilding abundance in the oceans accurately reflect a wide range of people's priorities.

Recognizing the importance of diverse perspectives, the organization acknowledges that different communities may have unique priorities and viewpoints on how to rebuild abundance. Therefore, they actively seek input from community leaders to ensure that their recommendations are comprehensive and representative.

In addition to engaging with community leaders, the organization also organizes symposiums and workshops to gather feedback and interact with various stakeholders. They specifically mention their interactions with Indigenous leaders and their efforts to prioritize Indigenous knowledge systems in ecosystem resilience and abundance. This demonstrates their commitment to including Indigenous perspectives and incorporating reconciliation commitments into fisheries management.

Overall, the organization values community input and recognizes the importance of considering a wide range of perspectives when making recommendations for rebuilding abundance in the oceans. They believe that by incorporating diverse priorities and knowledge systems, they can work towards a better future for fisheries and act with urgency against climate change.

The organization mentioned in the episode circulates its audit and recommendations to the minister's office, emphasizing the importance of communicating with community leadership and sharing their results. However, they have not yet had the opportunity to meet directly with the newest minister, as they took office at the end of the summer. Nevertheless, they ensure that the audit and recommendations, including the letters of recommendation, are shared with the minister's office.

The organization discussed in the episode focuses on improving science monitoring and management in the fisheries sector. While acknowledging substantial investments in fisheries science and management programs, they highlight a lack of focus and dedicated capacity to implement real change on the water. They emphasize the importance of incorporating sound science into decision-making processes, extending beyond year-to-year decisions.

Recognizing the turnover in leadership within the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, with six different ministers over six years, the organization emphasizes the need for the new fisheries minister to fulfill their mandate on fishery sustainability and make critical decisions regarding key stocks like cod, capelin, mackerel, and herring. They also advocate for the inclusion of more fish under the Amended Fisheries Act and rebuilding regulations to provide optimal protection for fisheries in Canada.

The organization has engaged with the government through briefings and interactions, sharing their results and recommendations to improve science monitoring and management. They have received positive feedback and have been informed about ongoing efforts behind the scenes, such as the progress of rebuilding plans awaiting final approval. However, they also stress the importance of holding the government accountable for accomplishing the necessary tasks.

The organization's fishery audit coincided with the Office of the Auditor General's audit on monitoring. Both audits revealed pervasive issues in fisheries monitoring, including compliance and enforcement of fisheries catches. While there have been improvements with the fisheries monitoring policy introduced in 2019, implementation has been delayed, resulting in a significant gap in understanding what is being caught and making well-informed decisions on quotas.

One of the challenges highlighted by the organization is effectively communicating scientific concepts, such as the definition of a stock, to non-scientific audiences. They emphasize the importance of utilizing reliable information and evidence to comprehend the state of fisheries and design management measures that support healthy fisheries. They stress the need for a long-term vision and commitment from the government to bring about lasting change for the betterment of the oceans and coastal communities.

Sharks in the southern Atlantic ocean are being protected through a citizen science program with sport fishers who regularly target sharks. Why is this a big deal you ask?

Previous to this program, sport fishers were killing the sharks that they caught due to the sharks' bad reputation. A study quantified the number of sharks killed per year as 18 sharks were caught per trip (on average), which equated to 3000 sharks per year (approximately). One sport fisher finally realized the devastation that was happening to the shark population of different species. So he spoke up. 

After many challenges, the sport fisher started a citizen science program over a decade ago, where sport fishers would tag their shark catches and release them instead of killing them. The program now boasts 150 fishers who tagged over 800 sharks. Those 800 sharks are not dead because of these fishers and the citizen science program that exists to protect them.

Link to article: https://bit.ly/33Ab1Tu

Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc 

COVID caused a lot of disruption in the form of shutdowns, but something that was always available in North America was grocery stores. However, there were some small island states such as Cape Eleuthera that did not know if their food was coming via shipping boats. Luckily it was only temporary. 

During that time, people looked to the sea to provide food without regard for catch limits and quotas. People were searching for food and needed to eat, so catch sizes were not on their minds. 

Dr. Nick Higgs noticed this behaviour and decided to study how many conchs were affected by this temporary food shortage. 

Nick is on the podcast today to discuss his new paper and the results of the study. We also discuss what this could mean for conservation. 

Connect with Dr. Nick Higgs:
1) Website: http://www.ceibahamas.org/

Ghost nets are discarded nets from fishing vessels that float around in the ocean unmonitored. The nets continue to snag fish, marine mammals, sea turtles, and seabirds that causes needless deaths every year. 

There are organizations that search for Ghost Nets to retrieve and dispose of them; however, disposing of the plastic nets is not as simple as we think. The nets are often discarded in landfills, but they have the potential to become part of the circular economy. 

Nina Latinga, the co-founder for Nets For Net Zero, is working to connect companies and organizations that would like to use the nets in their circular economy. She joins me on the podcast to discuss how she came across this venture from a background in the circular fashion industry. 

Connect with Nets For Net Zero:
Website: https://www.netsfornetzero.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/netsfornetzero/

Check out all of our episodes on www.speakupforblue.com

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

A new report written by researchers at the University of British Columbia and supported by Oceana reveals the foreign fisheries subsidies are contributing to overfishing in foreign countries. 

Countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, the USA, Thailand, Taiwan, Spain, Indonesia, and Norway will pay up to 35% of their total subsidies to their distant fleets to fish within the jurisdiction of other countries. In some countries, the foreign vessels outfish the domestic fleet two to one. The foreign fleet is often not allowed to fish and contribute to the illegal, unregulated, and unreported fisheries. 

The best way to find out if your tax dollars are contributing to distant fleet fishing is to speak to your federal elected representative. 

Link to article: https://news.mongabay.com/2021/07/billions-in-fishing-subsidies-finance-social-ecological-harm-report-finds/

Check out all of our episodes on www.speakupforblue.com

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Two experience Canadian Fisheries and Oceans scientists have revealed that data points to multiple factors that are causing the recovery of Northern Cod to move at a snail's pace and seals are not the driving force.

Many fishers along the North Atlantic coast in Canada and the US think that the large population of harp seals (7.6 million) is to blame for the slow recovery. However, the blame lies on other major factors such as climate change and competition for the cod's prey by whales, seabirds, and people. 

Warming waters due to climate change are influencing the change in dominant fish in places like the Gulf of Maine. Hake is becoming more dominant as the cold water-loving fish move north to cooler waters. 

Capelin is a favourite prey food for cod, but it is also prey for whales, seabirds, and people. The low number of cod may not be able to dominate the food chain with their smaller numbers.

A number of studies have shown that seals are not affecting the recovery of Northern Cod. The study of seal scat (poo) showed that cod is not a major portion of their diet. Other studies showed an increase in the numbers of seals in a population along with an increase in the number of cod in the same area. If seals were eating cod, then the cod stocks would not be growing in the presence of a growing population of seals.

Link to Article: https://www.saltwire.com/atlantic-canada/business/dont-blame-the-seals-dfo-scientists-say-fixation-on-pinnipods-ignores-other-ecological-factors-100606033/

Check out all of our episodes on www.speakupforblue.com

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Judging from the title, you probably think that I am going crazy. Of course, banning bottom trawling will improve the ocean. But you will be surprised when I tell you that there haven't been many studies that provide evidence of recovery. 

Listen to the episode to find out why!

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Seaspiracy completely dismissed dolphin-safe labels on tuna as corrupt and a failure; however, they did not look at the differences between the labels and the regulations in various countries. 

The US has regulations for companies that say their tuna is dolphin-safe and it stems from their Marine Mammal Protection Act and an Amendment that goes back to 1990. The program decreased the mortality of dolphins from 130,000, in 1987, to less than 1,000 in 2018 (mortality has been less than 1,000/year since 2011). 

These numbers are only in the US and it does not include the problems internationally, but it is progress and has saved hundreds of thousands of dolphins.

Links To Article:
1) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/how-dolphin-safe-is-canned-tuna

2) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/how-to-pick-most-dolphin-safe-tuna

3) https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=0aa891101f20fbb49bed1f1430d45014&r=PART&n=50y10.0.1.3.2#sp50.10.216.h

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

Seaspiracy has generated discussions on every social media platform, which can be considered a good thing if you want more people to discuss reducing/eliminating overfishing in the Ocean. However, the types of conversations that I have seen and in which I participated have shown me a few things that we, as a conservation society of newly inspired activists and marine scientists/conservationists, need to mend before we can move forward and do what we set out to do. 

I go over some of the conversations that I have had on Clubhouse, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram and where I see we can turn these conversations into action. 

Follow the podcast if you are interested in learning more about fisheries and what you can do to help reduce/eliminate overfishing. 

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

There is no doubt in my mind that Seaspiracy got many facts wrong and misinformed the viewers on many aspects of the fishing industry. They entangled some facts with misinformation or misrepresentation that will cause people to look for the wrong solutions.  They could have made this film so much better by showing some of the solutions that people could support.

So here are 3 things I think Seaspiracy should have covered in their documentary.  

There is a push by the marine science, conservation, and government world to use safer lobster traps that will not pose a threat to marine mammals, such as the critically endangered Northern Right Whales. The problem is that fisheries organizations are worried that the use of the gear is unaffordable and therefore unrealistic. 

A recent article on NPR has an audio snippet that gives a peek into what it's like to observe a ropeless lobster trap come to the surface and not pose a risk to marine mammals. 

Links To Article: https://www.npr.org/2021/02/21/969527300/ropeless-lobster-fishing-could-save-the-whales-could-it-kill-the-industry

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

Two stories for this episode, both fisheries-related.

The first story is an update about the Nova Scotia Lobster Fishery conflict that has escalated over the past week. The Non-Indigenous Commercial fishermen are trying to stop the Indigenous Mi'kmaq community from exercising their right to legally fish for lobster. Check out episode 1068 to listen to more about the conflict. 

Two incidences happened last week that you need to know about. Listen to find out what happened. 

The second story is a cool example of how researchers have used forensic science to identify the types of elasmobranchs (sharks, skates, and rays) that are being caught in an artisanal fishery in Costa Rica. The results could prove to protect a hammerhead shark species during a critical time in their life cycle. 

Link To Article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783620302721

Listen to the podcast to find out why. 

Register for the Mindful Conservation Conference: 
https://www.absolutelysmashingllc.com/mindful-conference

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

The battle for lobster fishing continues in Nova Scotia, Canada as Indigenous people begin their lobster fisheries year-round as they were given the right to do so 21 years earlier with a Supreme Court Decision called the Marshall Decision. The Decision granted Indigenous people the right to fish all year round for a moderate livelihood in accordance with the 1760-61 Peace and Friendship Treaties between East Coast First Nations and the British Crown. 

Non-Indigenous Commercial fishers are not thrilled that a Mik'maw nation is taking up their right to fish lobster year-round and have protested in various ways including harassment on the water, taking up lobster traps, and violence. The protesters are saying that fishing year-round will go against all conservation efforts that set specific seasons for the right time to fish.

Hakai Magazine wrote a great piece on the conflict asking four experts for their professional opinions on the issue. Their conclusions? Fishing all year round will not violate conservation efforts for the lobster fishery as conservation of this species depends on effort and not seasons. 

Link to Article: https://www.hakaimagazine.com/news/mikmaw-fishery-dispute-is-not-about-conservation-scientists-say/

Listen to the episode to find out why this matters. 

Want To Talk Oceans? Join the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

Fisheries management is a tricky situation, especially when multiple policies are created for different cultures. Canadian Fisheries are not different and conflict has arisen between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous fisheries. 

The Government of Canada provided a way for Indigenous people to fish out of season to make a "moderate living." However, what constitutes a moderate living these days is up for debate. 

Listen to the episode for more details.

Links to Articles: 

1) https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5731129

2) https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/mi-kmaq-self-regulated-moderate-livelihood-fishery-1.5727622 

Do you think the Non-Indigenous People have a right to be concerned? Let me know your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

We don't always hear about fishing activity in North Korean or Russian waters, especially as a North American-focused media agency; however, I wanted to cover some news about the areas as it was published on the Global Fishing Watch website (https://globalfishingwatch.org/).

The organization conducted a study that looked at illegal fishing activity in North Korean waters (by Chinese fishing vessels) and illegal fishing in Russian waters (by North Korean fishing vessels).

The conclusion was that illegal fishing is active in both areas without any changes in activity in 2019 or the beginning of 2020. 

Listen to the episode to find out more details. 

Link To Article: https://globalfishingwatch.org/research/2019_analysis_illegal_fishing/

Do you think recent changes to Chinese distant-water fishing practices (discussed during the episode) will decrease illegal fishing in North Korean water? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

The Trump Administration was behind in the polls in Maine so they decided to help the number one export industry, the lobster fishery, by allowing fishing in a Marine Monument and getting Europe to agree to eliminate an 8% tariff on lobster exports. 

Link To Article: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/trump-turns-an-election-year-eye-on-canadian-lobster-1.5704491

Do you think the Ocean should suffer for political gain? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

China's distant-water fleet is always in the news when we discuss IUU (Illegal, unregulated, and unreported) fishing activity. Unfortunately, other countries can't do much to force a country like China to change; however, in 2020, China made some big improvements to their international fishing policies that might help clamp down on the IUU fishing that has been happening for too long!

Link to Article: https://news.mongabay.com/2020/08/china-issues-new-sustainability-rules-for-its-notorious-fishing-fleet/

Do you think these improvements by China will improve international fishing in the long run? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

A Waterfront City project in a city in Indonesia is threatening the livelihoods of the local fishing community as the project may destroy important fish habitat and cause the coastal area to be more choppy that has damaged their boats already.

Link To Article: https://news.mongabay.com/2020/07/indonesian-fishers-face-livelihood-threat-from-beautiful-tourism-project/

Do you think the Indonesian Government will allow more protests by the local fishing community so they have their say? Share your thoughts/experience in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

There are 260 Fishing vessels lining up along the border of the Galapagos Marine Reserve ready to poach fish just like a similar incident in 2017 where 300 tonnes of fish were found on a Chinese fishing vessel (most of the fish species were sharks). This is not the first time illegal fishing has happened. I name some other incidents that have happened in other countries.

Link To Article: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53562439 

Do you think the Ecuadorian Government is doing enough to protect the marine reserve? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/speakupforblue/

Speak Up For Blue Twitter: https://twitter.com/SpeakUpforBlue

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

The Guide To Mindful Conservation: Dancing In Pink Hiking Boots:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/31P4UY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3f7hDJw

There is a huge problem within the International Fisheries industry and that is the rampant use of Fisheries Slaves. Fisheries slaves are often recruited by companies to go on distant-bound vessels who overwork their crew, underfeed them, and throw them overboard when they die or are close to dying due to inhumane working conditions. 

The Indonesian government might institute a ban on their citizens working on international fishing vessels to protect them and work with the recruitment companies to ensure they work with the proper companies. 

Link To Article: https://news.mongabay.com/2020/05/indonesia-may-bar-citizens-from-working-on-foreign-fishing-boats-after-spate-of-deaths/

What would it take for you to work in a fishing vessel in international waters? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Check out the new Speak Up For The Ocean Blue Podcast App: http://www.speakupforblue.com/app.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram

Speak Up For Blue Twitter

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

Jimmy Thomson is an environmental journalist, who wrote an interesting article about how Fisheries Observers off the Coast of BC are receiving threats about reporting the true numbers of fish they see being taken. 

I invited Jimmy on the podcast to tell us some of the stories he was told by 11 Fisheries Observers and what they continue to go through while doing their jobs. 

I wanted to have Jimmy on the podcast because I normally recommend to early-career scientists that they become Fisheries Observers to get experience while being paid very well; however, there are important aspects about the job that they should know before applying.

Link to Article: https://thenarwhal.ca/youre-out-there-alone-whistleblowers-say-workplace-abuse-hides-true-impacts-of-b-c-s-trawl-fishery/

Jimmy's Twitter: https://twitter.com/jwsthomson

Would you become a Fisheries Observe now that you know of the potential disadvantages? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Check out the new Speak Up For The Ocean Blue Podcast App: http://www.speakupforblue.com/app.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram

Speak Up For Blue Twitter

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

Madame Curiosity
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2xUlSax
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2V38QQ1

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Ocean Science Radio
Apple Podcast: https://apple.co/3chJMfA
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3bnkP18

Our Seas Coalition has called for Scotland to ban trawling within 3 miles of the coast to ensure the sustainability of fisheries for the future. The Coalition is made up of various stakeholders including marine ecotourism firms, fishing communities, salmon conservationists and others. 

There are other fishing groups that oppose the ban as they feel the current system of voluntary closures and other measures will suffice. 

Link To Article: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/05/conservationists-call-for-three-mile-coastal-fishing-limit-in-scotland

Marine Conservation Happy Hour Episode:
https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/marine-conservation-happy-hour/id1358697135?i=1000461213370

I propose a marine spatial plan. What do you propose? Let us know in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Check out the new Speak Up For The Ocean Blue Podcast App: http://www.speakupforblue.com/app.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram

Speak Up For Blue Twitter

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

Indonesia is known for its beautiful beaches and clear ocean waters that are visited by millions of people every year. They are also known for blowing up boats who fish illegally in their waters, or so they used to be...maybe...we aren't sure yet. 

A new Fisheries Minister is contemplating the rule of blowing up boats is they are caught fishing illegally and replace it with boat seizures that are either auctioned off or given to local fishers. 

Some environmental groups are worried that the latter won't be much of a deterrent for illegal fishing. What say you? Share your thoughts in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Check out the new Speak Up For The Ocean Blue Podcast App: http://www.speakupforblue.com/app.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram

Speak Up For Blue Twitter

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

Projects For Wildlife Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2Oc17gy
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/37rinWz

A really good article was published in the Tyee recently, where the author, Andrew Nikiforuk, spoke with Global Fisheries Expert, Dr. Daniel Pauly, and asked him what he would change about global fisheries if he were a Global Fisheries Minister. Daniel had 3 things that he would change:

1) End Government Subsidies For Industrial Fisheries Fleet;
2) Create Fishing Reserves For Small, Local Fisheries; and,
3) Establish No-Go Zones To Protect Fish.

Listen to the episode for more information.

Here are some links on Dr. Daniel Pauly:
University Of British Columbia Website
The Sea Around Us Project Website

What would you do if you were Global Fisheries Minister? Share your plan in the Speak Up For Blue Facebook Group: http://www.speakupforblue.com/group.

Check out the new Speak Up For The Ocean Blue Podcast App: http://www.speakupforblue.com/app.

Speak Up For Blue Instagram

Speak Up For Blue Twitter

Check out the Shows on the Speak Up For Blue Network:

Marine Conservation Happy Hour
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k4ZB3x
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2kkEElk

ConCiencia Azul:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k6XPio
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k4ZMMf

Dugongs & Seadragons:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lB9Blv
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lV6THt

Environmental Studies & Sciences
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lx86oh
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2lG8LUh

Marine Mammal Science:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2k5pTCI
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2k1YyRL

A huge Marine Conservation win today as the State of California passed a law that would ban the use of drift gillnets for the swordfish licenses in state waters. There are less than 20 swordfish permits in the state and compensation will be offered to those who retire their nets and/or permits early. 

Source

Enjoy the Episode!!!

Tell us your thoughts on this huge win in our Facebook Group.

Don't forget to check out the Deep Dive show in our Patreon Community.

Today's Update episode cover two stories and an opinion piece that I have about something that people freak out on way too much. 

There is so much news out there that it was tough to pick just 3 things, but I thought these would be the ones that weren't getting the attention that they should. 

Today I discuss the following:
1) Menhaden fish catches will be reduced to ensure their sustainability (8:40);
2) My Opinion on a post that went down in a Facebook Group about Marine Careers where one person got hate thrown at them for asking people to collaborate with them on a Marine Conservation Blog and why I like the idea (18:04); and,
3) Octopuses were found walking on the sand in fairly large numbers and it has scientists baffled (34:18).

Enjoy the Podcast!!!

Let me know what you think of the episode by joining our Facebook Group for the Podcast.

Support Speak Up For Blue's Efforts to build a platform to raise awareness for Marine Science and Conservation and help you live for a better Ocean. Contribute to our Patreon Campaign

Ret Talbot is a Freelance Fisheries Jounalist, and a friend of Speak Up For Blue, who has recently released a podcast of his own called Beyond Data. It's a podcast about fisheries, the data behind them (or lack thereof) and their story. Ret will explore the stories of fish we know and some we may not knew existed like his first episode on the oyster toadfish in New York. 

Ret stopped by the podcast to tell us why he moved into podcasting and why he thought is was important to focus on fisheries in each episode. 

Check out Ret's Podcast Beyond Data 

Enjoy The Podcast!!!

Sign up for the upcoming Webinar by Nick entitled: "Making Your Research Freely-Available with MarXiv:The (free!) research repository for ocean-conservation and marine climate science"

Let me know what you think of the episode by joining our Facebook Group for the Podcast.

This episode was brought to you by Octo (Open Communications for The Oceans). Check out their recent MPA News (Marine Protected Area News) issue helping inform the Marine Science and Conservation field around the world.

Support Speak Up For Blue's Efforts to create a free pr=resource program for Ocean Citizen Scientists to help move Marine Science and Conservation forward by collecting information for various Citizen Science program. Contribute to our Patreon Campaign

The Canadian Government has a long relationship with the First Nations groups across Canada; however, the relationship sucks. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made a campaign promise to reconcile Canada's relationship with First Nations groups in Canada. He's been Prime Minister for almost 2 years, but hasn't done much to help...in fact, people say he's done the opposite. An article in the National Post covers a story where the Canadian Government gave the opportunity for a number of First Nations groups to bid on 25% of the quota for Arctic Surf Clam.

I also talk about a study that provides 3 ways that the East Coast of the US is sinking and will be prone to flooding. 

Enjoy the Podcast!!!

Let me know what you think of the episode by joining our Facebook Group for the Podcast.

Support Speak Up For Blue's Efforts to create a free pr=resource program for Ocean Citizen Scientists to help move Marine Science and Conservation forward by collecting information for various Citizen Science program. Contribute to our Patreon Campaign

Griffin Carpenter joins me on the podcast to talk about fisheries policy pre and post BREXIT. Yup! I said it! We are going to talk about BREXIT and how it will affect fisheries management for the UK and the European Union. I know there are many things to consider regarding the UK separating from the EU, but for our podcast we deal about Ocean management so we will discuss sustainable fisheries management. 

Griffin provides some great insight into the current structure of EU Fisheries Policy and how it will change and the issues that may arise in the future. 

Here is some more info that were mentioned in the podcast:

1) How BREXIT will impact fisheries policy

2) Griffin's Twitter

Enjoy the Podcast!!!

Support Speak Up For Blue's Efforts to build a platform to raise awareness for Marine Science and Conservation and help you live for a better Ocean. Contribute to our Patreon Campaign

We always talk about buying sustainable fish, but we never talk about what happens in the high seas. We are talking about it today. 

We covered the story after Keith Davis missing under suspicious circumstances. 2 years later, the story has developed and exposed the darkness of fisheries on the high seas.

Enjoy the podcast!

Are you looking to change the way you eat for a better health and environment? Start using Arbonne nutrition and health care products that are all natural and environmentally friendly. I use them all the time and their nutrition line has transformed the way I eat and my health.

Email me today, andrew@speakupforblue.com to find out how you can transform your health.

Looking to transform your health and wellness using Arbonne products? Learn about our starter package to get you living for a better Ocean by contacting me at andrew@speakupforblue.com.